|"Forget the Rest" blog|
Send a blank email to subscribe or unsubscribe to these bulletins.
Bulletin #196: LANL incompetence, coverup; fundraising appeal
If the link on the image above does not work use this one.
Dear friends –
Since Bulletin 195 there have been very significant developments in nuclear weapons discourse in this country and internationally, especially as regards the troubled Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).
Since then we’ve been mainly working with the news media, local activists, and with international NGOs and diplomats at the U.N. in New York. We’ve been busy with fundraising too, and we need your help with this.
First however, if you haven’t seen today’s blockbuster exposeˊ in the Santa Fe New Mexican of LANL’s latest fiasco and cover-up (“Missteps & Secrets: LANL officials downplayed waste’s dangers even after WIPP leak”), it’s a must-read. Reporter Patrick Malone worked on this story for months and intensively over the past few weeks. We provided many hours of behind-the-scenes help and advice but most of the research was done by the New Mexican.
It is never easy to penetrate the opaque world of the warhead complex and it is particularly difficult when there is a carefully-orchestrated cover-up, as (still) is the case here.
In addition to today’s tour de force, background and previous articles by Malone and environment reporter Staci Matlock can be found at the New Mexican’s web page, “From LANL to Leak.” The New Mexican deserves great credit for this body of fine work.
Meanwhile, as the Albuquerque Journal reported (based on research we provided), “LANL chief’s compensation tops $1.5M.” The staggering increase in executive compensation at LANL over the past few years has occurred over a period during which LANL has wasted more than a billion dollars in failed projects and accidents. LANL’s two key nuclear materials facilities have been shut down for years. The total bill to the taxpayer is really unknown and could be much higher.
The huge executive salary increases also occurred during a period in which two different DOE contracting officers each recommended not extending the LANS management and operating (M&O) contract an extra year, because of poor performance. (See this page for evaluations of all warhead complex M&O contractors; 2014 results are pending). Acting Administrator Neile Miller overrode the 2012 “do not extend” recommendation shortly before her departure from government. Acting Administrator Bruce Held upheld the second one in 2013.
It remains to be seen what will happen this year. There are plenty of problems. The main plutonium facility (PF-4) has been partially shut down all year because of serious concerns with criticality safety, and will remain so for the entire balance of this fiscal year (FY) 2015 as safety reviews and corrective actions continue. Gross incompetence at LANL, coupled with some degree of cover-up both before and after the fact, shut down the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), incurring hundreds of millions in extra costs as well as new risks. Future WIPP operations are not fully assured and the ongoing costs of working in what is now a contaminated facility are unknown.
In another recent serious blow to management, covered in a stunning scoop by Todd Jacobson at the Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor, DOE is now set to decertify LANL’s accounting system for capital projects. Until the problems are corrected DOE will not allow LANL to proceed with any capital project past its initial stages. See also this New Mexican article. This won’t the last we hear of this.
Most of you have seen the recent national press regarding the cracks developing in grandiose U.S. nuclear weapons modernization plans. We put a few of the recent articles here; more are coming (many need explanatory or corrective commentary). We put out a press release (“DoD Reviews of Nuclear Weapons Operations Largely “Management Clichés,” Fail to Address Core Problems, Group Charges”) following Secretary Hagel’s recent press conference during which he vowed to “fix” DoD’s nuclear management problems.
On a related topic, some of you may be interested in these slides from our recent Albuquerque public meeting (“In the eye of the peak oil storm,” Oct 28, 2014).
In another news bit we cannot fail to mention, the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF) was permanently cancelled on August 21, 2014, not just indefinitely deferred.
Now I must ask you for money, and to reach out to your friends and associates if you believe in the value and efficacy of our work. We are also looking for committed volunteers.
Some of you have been part of the Los Alamos Study Group community for years. Others may not know much about us. It’s the time of year when I must write to request your financial support for the Study Group’s work next year. In the nuclear weapons business, this next year is crucial, both in the U.S. and internationally.
You can be a monthly sustaining donor, make a one-time donation of any size, donate stock or other assets (thus avoiding capital gains), or even donate an unused vehicle. You can donate through our secure on-line portal, or via regular mail at the address below. Please call us at 505-265-1200 if you have any questions, or write. Donations to the Los Alamos Study Group, a 501(c)(3) organization, are fully tax-deductible.
We very much hope you will help us with peer-to-peer fundraising and with outreach more generally, and join in our work in other ways. We have prepared issue and fundraising packets for those who want to help in this way. Talk to your friends and associates – please. You have sympathetic contacts we do not.
If you are not familiar with our work please take a look at our web site. See also the enclosed materials, if you are getting this letter by postal mail.
The Los Alamos Study Group, based in New Mexico, works primarily to foster nuclear disarmament. We do so in the context of urgently seeking sustainable energy and climate policies, safe management of nuclear facilities, and transition to a sustainable and just economy. We have no time to lose. In New Mexico these issues are all closely related. Since our first public meetings 25 years ago, we have approached these issues together, in their total cultural, economic, and political context, in as much technical detail as time has allowed.
This is not the moment for modesty. I am pleased to say that in concert with allies in government and outside it, and drawing on our informal pool of sympathetic experts from around the country, we’ve built an unmatched track record of success in stopping hair-brained nuclear projects planned and underway in this state.
We have repeatedly stymied nuclear weapons projects described by the Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) as “essential.” Sometimes, as in the recent case of the $6+ billion plutonium warhead core “(“pit”) factory under design at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), which we delayed and then killed through litigation, analysis, and hundreds of lobbying visits, we had to buck a national consensus supporting the project not just within government but in the arms control community and its funders as well.
We use every efficient means we can, from lobbying, to media exposure, to litigation, to organizing, to advertising (no longer affordable). In our public education role we’ve seeded or participated in more than 3,000 separate news articles and hundreds of radio programs. We’ve held hundreds of public meetings here in New Mexico and hundreds of meetings with decisionmakers on Capitol Hill. Our research is used around the world.
Our training and long experience give us a solid overview of nuclear weapons issues that is rare outside the nuclear establishment. Our relationships go back a long ways in some cases and our access in Washington is quite good. Because of our record and the threat we pose to bad policy and projects we are respected by friends and adversaries alike.
We remain community-based in New Mexico and independent of political fashions and parties. We are accountable to our membership. With your help, we will leverage these assets in the critical contests ahead.
The Study Group relies on New Mexico sources for more than half its budget – which is always pretty tight, uncertain, and limiting. We have “the power of proximity” (A. Roy), but to wield it we need committed friends.
I imagine many people think it takes tens of millions of dollars to change U.S. nuclear policy. From long experience I can assure you it takes orders of magnitude less. We don’t have to chop down the deadly “Upas Tree” (Pushkin). Girdling will do. In tough times even less is required. But beware: those watering it want all the water.
We can never fully predict when or how success will come, though we will keep winning on nuclear weapons overall because history, budgets, much of the military, and some conservatives are on our side. Nuclear weapons are increasingly unaffordable and visibly obsolete, while remaining as immoral, illegal, and profoundly dangerous as ever.
In the coming year we will:
Please help us if you can, or reach out to others who can. We will use your contribution as effectively as possible.
Greg Mello, Executive Director
P.S.: You may be interested in these generous endorsements:
David Krieger, President, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, “The Los Alamos Study Group is one of the most effective organizations in the country in providing clear and understandable information about what is going on behind the closed doors of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The Laboratory is one of the major proponents and drivers of continued US reliance on nuclear weapons. Without the Los Alamos Study Group much of what happens at the Laboratory would be hidden from public view or distorted beyond recognition by clever public relations.”
Dr. Frank von Hippel, Program on Science and Global Security, Princeton University: “The Los Alamos Study Group plays a unique role in the nuclear-weapons policy debate. Its Director, Greg Mello, understands more deeply than any other independent expert the plans and policy initiatives of the nation's nuclear-weapon laboratories as they try to construct a future of planned obsolescence and continual renewal for the U.S. nuclear-weapon arsenal. He is a precious early warning system and strategic advisor for those of us who propose, in contrast, a future in which the U.S. nuclear stockpile is steadily reduced and increasingly marginalized in U.S. security policy considerations.”
One detail worth mentioning in today’s story is that the Department of Energy (DOE) Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) actually reprimanded the person who tipped off WIPP officials that more of the drums LANL sent might be dangerous. That is, the cover-up does not just include LANS, the corporation responsible for running LANL, but apparently extends into the DOE site office as well. We see this as ominous and believe that it calls for independent government investigation prior to setting up the proposed new DOE Los Alamos cleanup office.