Follow us | |
"Remember Your Humanity" blog |
January 13, 2020 Permalink for this letter. Please forward! Other Letters This letter: Reminder: please come and recruit your friends to the press conference and demonstration outside Santa Fe City Hall at noon on Wednesday Jan. 15 (map); more Dear New Mexico friends – 1. Please help us recruit for Wednesday's press conference and demonstration As we explained in yesterday's letter and previous ones, on Wednesday the City of Santa Fe will announce the finalists for "Master Developer" of the former College of Santa Fe site and possibly some surrounding lands. While it seems absurd that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) could be a possible "master developer," we can't be sure what this City Administration wants. NNSA and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are apparently present in some (not all) other proposals as tenant(s). Getting people there on Wednesday is the most important thing we can recommend to do in our immediate region right now for the sake of nuclear disarmament and future of the region. 2. Leading Democrats seem to love plutonium pits more than environmental knowledge, protection, and impact mitigation Our two senators, Congressman Ben Ray Lujan, and Governor Michele Grisham had nothing to say when asked by the Associated Press if they support further environmental analysis prior to expanding pit production at LANL. They are waiting for NNSA talking points later this week. We are glad their environmental hypocrisy is finally getting some attention. 3. Workshops next month We are scheduling in-depth workshops on NNSA's and LANL's efforts to build a pit production facility in Los Alamos while greatly expanding LANL for the sake of designing and now building new nuclear weapons. LANL has not seen such a huge proposed expansion, involving thousands (net) of new staff and some $13 billion in capital improvements and new buildings, since the early 1950s. So far:
4. Last week's Santa Fe City Hall action It was an excellent event, one where -- as is always the case -- reality was illuminated by each speaker in a unique way. Some who didn't speak quietly held signs, making a total presence of a dozen or so. LANL was the only issue brought up in public comments. We thought the City Council paid respectful attention, though the Mayor seemed annoyed. As mentioned last time, the Midtown Campus decision process is open-ended, fluid, and uncertain -- and for now closed to formal public input. With your help we are creating democratic opportunities. We are just beginning. We see the Midtown process as part and parcel of building a wider culture of peace -- and very closely linked with halting construction and operation of a new plutonium pit factory in Los Alamos. We think that for the nuclear weapons enterprise, trying to set up shop in Santa Fe will be a bridge too far. The Santa Fe Reporter ("Opposition to LANL’s Midtown bid grows," Jan 8, 2020) filed a supportive story. 5. What are these pits for? In a nutshell, and to correct some recent NNSA statements, plutonium pits are needed in the 2030s solely to field all-new warheads of a (new) type and (increased) number (several hundred) that will enable future breakout from current deployment levels should a future administration desire to do so -- say, to signal "resolve" in tensions with Russia. (Resolve for what? Omnicide?) Got that? These pits are "needed" solely for new nuclear weapons and to allow, if desired, uploading of more warheads than are deployed right now. They are not needed to increase "safety." They are not needed because of "pit aging." We have enough modern warheads of the exact right kind to take care of those problems, which aren't really serious anyway. Of course, retiring all silo-based missiles would be the simplest and best solution. As it happens -- just coincidentally of course -- "surging" with round-the-clock pit production at LANL to make these new pits starting in 2023 and then ramping up quickly also makes possible --
It adds up to "real money." Think of what that would buy for this country. Without these pits, the U.S. warhead complex would have very little to do in the 2030s. The Navy has already said it does not want any new warheads. Nevertheless NNSA is planning to hire an extra 20,000 workers over the coming 5 years, on top of the existing 41,000 -- a mad flurry of activity. 6. Talking points Lydia prepared these talking points for our Jan. 2 workshop in Santa Fe. You can use them in your letters to officials. (For now, let's concentrate on getting as many people there at noon on Wednesday as possible. We need to concentrate our efforts!) We will devote the next letter to more. In the meantime we have to ask -- what will our story be? Because those of you who spoke last Wednesday touched upon, in different ways, the momentous choice involved as the City of Santa Fe contemplates reversing 400 years of identification with Saint Francis as well as 25 years of formal City resolutions to, for the first time, possibly support nuclear weapons and weave them into the fabric and identity of Santa Fe. It is an enormously consequential decision not just for Santa Fe, up to now a City of Peace, but for the world. In this decision, two worlds contend -- two stories, two worldviews, two normative orders, two identities, two ways of ordering society. 7. Two worlds in collision -- what will our story be? We might call it, "St. Francis vs. Plutopia." Which will it be for Santa Fe? What do we value? One way or another, this collision was what concerned several speakers at City Hall last Wednesday. This was what Ohkay Owingeh elder Herman Agoyo, with whom we frequently met in those years, questioned in a 1993 talk, entitled "Who Here Will Begin This Story?" I would like to quote him at length:
St. Francis prayed, "Lord, make me an instrument of your peace." Some in Santa Fe and our senators' offices are praying, "Government, make me an instrument of your wars." And with that, civilization comes to an end -- even before the third bomb is dropped. As would the social, economic, and cultural development of Santa Fe, if we let that be our story. We have to choose. Now that NNSA wants to build a plutonium factory in our midst, we can't kick The Bomb down the road any longer. The choices for a Santa Fe "meta-narrative" in a time of ecological emergency boil down to life vs. death, biophilia vs. the death cult. Compare the Canticle of the Sun to Oppenheimer's self-identification, "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." (video). Generation vs. genocide. Sustainability and resilience vs. instability and the threat of extinction. Politically, administration vs. democracy. Russell Hoban's fine post-apocalyptic novel Riddley Walker features a central story that is canonical to the characters in the novel, called "The Eusa Story." The Story concludes with the "Littl Man" -- who is the "Addom" Eusa split after killing the "Hart of the Wud" -- questioning Eusa, whose lust for power has caused the death of millions, including his own wife and children.
Eusa has no communicable story -- no "public memory," in Herman Agoyo's terms. No purpose. Eusa sought "Chaynjis" but got more than he bargained for, with no end in sight for this pitiful shell of a man.
In the absence of an heroic story, one true to the reality of our situation on this planet and to our common humanity, Santa Fe and the region will be as rudderless and pathetic as Eusa. However with such a story, and the political commitment that goes with it, people can pull together toward something worthwhile. Everyone can have a job. Agoyo: "A new generation will have to be taught a new way of harmony, mutual respect, common interest, and love for each other and the planet....Memory and meaning go hand in hand."; Santa Fe already has such a story. It should not be thrown away. Thank you for your attention and -- Please help us recruit attendees for Wednesday! Greg Mello |
|||
|
|||
|