Satellite campuses make sense for crowded Los Alamos lab, SFNM, 12 Aug 2023

Satellite campuses make sense for crowded Los Alamos lab

By Phill Casaus pcasaus@sfnewmexican.com
Aug 12, 2023

In my mind, I can see Oppie with his porkpie hat and pipe, scanning the mesas and ravines he’d traveled as a kid — bedazzled by the view, cocooned in the seclusion.

Yup, this is the place.

Perfect for a secret lab.

Los Alamos it is.

Of course, that was the sepia-toned ‘40s. Today, in see-every-wrinkle high-def, you’ve got to think there’s no way in hell Robert Oppenheimer would pick the Hill to host the place that would become Los Alamos National Laboratory.

But that’s the irony, no? One of the great scientific minds of his time never envisioned the mutations that would create a workplace of nearly 20,000 people: far too big for the finger-thin plateaus and gut-dropping canyons that surround his creation.

That’s why Los Alamos officials are gingerly proposing branching out — they all but scream preliminary! when broaching the subject — beyond the fence; considering what life could be like if there were, say, LANL branches in maybe Santa Fe or someplace in the Albuquerque/Rio Rancho metroplex.

I know this will go over like a lump of plutonium in the morning coffee for the crowd that would like Los Alamos and its nuclear weapons mission to move off the Hill and head left, maybe 1,000 miles into the Pacific. But here’s the bare-knuckled reality: Satellite campuses for the lab only make perfect sense.

For one thing, LANL already is in Santa Fe and has been for years. It’s mostly back-end stuff — community outreach and paperwork and some of the accoutrement that comes with a mini-industry that employs scads of workers, with more to come courtesy of your tax dollars.

For another, there’s just no more room in Los Alamos — at least not for housing. If there were, I’m guessing three-bedroom, 2 1/2-bath domiciles would be filling every square yard. But they’re not.

So, here we are.

That Santa Fe and the Albuquerque area are attractive for satellite campus expansion is pure poetry when you consider a big hunk of lab employees don’t live in Los Alamos County. I know of a guy who commutes from Los Lunas every day for his job on the Hill. Yup, Los Lunas. No wonder he bought a Tesla.

Say you’ve never seen a Formula One race live? I invite you to the intersection of U.S. 550 and Interstate 25 every morning between 5:30 and 7:30 a.m., when commuters from Rio Rancho and Albuquerque put it in fifth gear for the trip north. Surely, many are headed to Santa Fe to work in state government, or in the schools, or in law enforcement (those folks can’t afford to actually live here, thus the sprint). But many others in that long line of cars keep rolling north, to Oppie’s place.

For those who can’t stomach the drive, they try to put down roots right here. Can’t understand why Santa Fe’s median home prices look like a telephone number, or the reasons behind apartment complexes sprouting like weeds near Cerrillos Road and I-25? It’s not all Texans and Californians escaping COVID and other Texans and Californians. It’s people who work for the lab.

I’m hoping the creation of another identifiable and permanent lab anchor in Santa Fe would light a fire under government leaders’ fannies to create more momentum for planned subdivisions that could house the Los Alamos presence. More globally, anything that takes the pressure off I-25 and U.S. 550, to say nothing of the environment, will be welcomed.

I promise you: If current conditions continue, the confluence of I-25/U.S. 550 soon will require flyovers and frontage roads on par with the Big-I in central Albuquerque. For those keeping the financial books, that’s coming out of all our pockets as well.

Though it’s sometimes easy to believe federal officials’ skulls are thicker than an oak tree stump, they’re plenty savvy when it comes to the sensitivity of all things lab. It’s why you won’t see a plutonium pit factory on Old Pecos Trail or on N.M. 528 in Rio Rancho. They’ve got enough trouble making that happen on the site in Los Alamos, at least in time for a 2026 deadline to begin production.

But payroll departments? Insurance? Red-tape creators or cutters? Those folks can be placed anywhere. Give them a laptop and a cubicle, and they can live closer to the office, labor more happily, and presumably, fulfill the mission for which they were hired — whether it’s advancing national security or just making sure the checks get cut on time.

Eighty years after Oppenheimer started hewing a lab out of a forest, the ironies are never-ending. It’s why you can’t discuss the lab’s future without a nod to its past. And when you look there, you’re struck by the fact the lab didn’t have to be Los Alamos. It could’ve been Gallup. It could’ve been Las Vegas, N.M.

Can you imagine?

In the end, Oppenheimer chose well for his time. But it’s now a new day. While the lab isn’t ever leaving the Hill, it’s time to envision an operation that more closely reflects reality — thus, satellite campuses.

Put more plainly: You shouldn’t have to commute from Los Lunas to Los Alamos in a Tesla. Or for that matter, a Chevy.

Phill Casaus is editor of The New Mexican.

Greg Mello, published comment:

Dear Phill -- I am late to the meeting, it seems.

A couple of minor points first. The Los Alamos Ranch School and surrounding land was not selected for underground facilities (although metaphorically they definitely were), and there is no limestone to be seen west of Gonzales Road in Santa Fe. Khal cites LANL figures saying most of the hires are coming -- or rather have come -- from New Mexico; the GAO cites NNSA officials saying that the northern New Mexico labor market is tapped out for LANL. LANL's Beierschmidt has said in public that most of his craft workers are coming from the Albuquerque metro area. So there's a disconnect here, a degree of opacity as to the real situation, with LANL controlling the data and spinning it. LANL is aggressively advertising nationally, and is advertising in Albuquerque as well. I have personally taken part in hours of discussions with officials from around the warhead complex, including LANL and NNSA senior management (Mason, Beierschmidt, Webster, Hruby, others) about NNSA hiring woes, at LANL in particular. LANL has a uniquely challenging demographic, with 39% of staff eligible for retirement, about 10% more than any other site. The long and short of it is that LANL, just to maintain itself, must hire aggressively from around the country. I think it was LANL's Robert Webster who said, in the past we would interview 50 and hire 20. Now we need to hire all 50 and "sort them out later."

Phill, it was the Army that chose the Los Alamos site. Oppenheimer had some input, yes, but the Army decided, among NM and eastern CA sites. Initially, when the Los Alamos site was chosen, it was estimated by Oppie and the Army that no more than 150 people -- scientists, technicians, guards, dependents -- would be needed, according to LANL historian Roger Meade. That made the Ranch School very attractive.

Phill, as LANL (Beierschmidt) recently said, many of the workers in Santa Fe's LANL facilities are commuting from the Bernalillo/Rio Rancho area, contributing to the congestion you cite at the I-25/US 550 interchange.

Now to the larger issues. Phill, you see NNSA and LANL decisions to expand, and also to expand into Santa Fe, as magisterial, beyond influence by you or anyone else. That is not how NNSA and LANL see it, as they write in their own studies. What you say about this, and how you guide news coverage, is very influential. New Mexicans are not just colonial subjects. We are citizens. Down the street from me, someone has a garage door painted with the faded words, "U.S. out of New Mexico." While we know that's not happening, the underlying spirit -- that New Mexico should have some sovereignty, some say in its own future beyond what Washington, DC tells us to do and to absorb -- is admirable IMO, albeit (like the paint) now somewhat faded.

What is this expansion for? Does this matter? Absolutely it does. It matters economically, socially, politically, and morally. LANL designs, tests, and builds weapons of mass destruction. Right now it is in the process of adding a factory capability, for plutonium parts, as well as other plutonium processing. Of course a lot of waste is involved. Specifically, this factory is for a new ICBM warhead and potentially other warheads, if LANL facilities can be successfully kept open. These pits, and the warheads to be made with them, are superfluous to the current arsenal.

Senior congressional staff close to Senator Heinrich tell me this will all be temporary -- that LANL's aging-but-remodeled factory will eventually shut down as it ages out, when it will be supplanted by the new facility in South Carolina. What a boondoggle this needless LANL factory is, assuming it operates reliably at all! The practical problems at LANL are extensive but as NNSA officially said last year, they now see themselves as "cost-conscious," but not "cost-constrained."

Why do this to Santa Fe? Please, let's think this through a bit more before jumping on the dirty money train.

^ back to top

2901 Summit Place NE Albuquerque, NM 87106, Phone: 505-265-1200