Nuclear Weapons & Materials Monitor
2/1/99
A classified Los Alamos National Laboratory program that has raised questions
with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board involves confinement
vessel explosives tests, apparently using plutonium-242 at the lab’s new
Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrotest Facility, according to declassified documents
and Energy Departmental sources. Details about the experiments, apparently
to be conducted later this year are highly classified, and simply the
fact that there is now a public discussion going on regarding the apparent
use of plutonium-242 in the tests has prompted inquiries by the Department
of Energy about a possible breach of security, NW&M Monitor has learned.
Experts say use of the plutonium-242 isotope in explosives tests would
allow a full-scale nuclear weapon mockup to be detonated without resulting
in any nuclear yield, an experiment that would allow detailed hydrodynamical
study of the early stages of the implosion of a nuclear weapon. But while
there have been hints in the public record about the possibility of such
tests being planned for DARHT, details have been tightly classified.
The mask slipped slightly with the public release of a Dec. 17 letter
from Assistant Energy Secretary Vic Reis to the Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board. The unclassified letter, which accompanied a classified
report, discusses issues related to “confinement vessel integrity” associated
with upcoming work to be done at Los Alamos. Reis’ letter came in response
to a Nov. 17 letter from the board to the DOE complaining about a classified
research project about to get underway. The letter questioned “efforts
to startup certain classified activities at the Los Alamos National Laboratory,”
offering no details. Reis’s response revealed that the tests involved
“more challenging charge loadings” involving “confinement vessel(s)”.
Classification around the project remains tight, but sources familiar
with the work left a trail of bread crumbs leading inexorably to the apparent
fact that the tests in question involve the use of plutonium-242 at DARHT.
The crumb trail starts in 1995, when a series of documents published by
the Energy Department led to questions about plutonium use in high explosive
tests. Conducted at least as far back as the 1950s, the tests involve
detonating various materials in sealed steel vessels and using very high-powered
x-rays to image the process. Some 40 to 60 of various types of such hydrotests
are conducted annually at test facilities at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore
Nationally Laboratory. To beef up its capability to do such tests, the
department is near completing DARHT at Los Alamos, which offers more powerful
x-rays, with the x-ray images to be taken from two directions, allowing
three-dimensional images of imploding objects to be taken. The first axis
of DARHT is scheduled to be completed and ready for tests this summer.
In an environmental impact statement produced for DARHT in 1996 after
activists sued trying to block the project, there were unclassified discussions
of the use of various materials in DARHT tests, but details of plutoniurn
usage in the facility were confined to a classified appendix. In addition,
the department’s Environmental Impact Statement on the stockpile stewardship
program, which came out around the same time, included a similar classified
annex dealing with plutonium-242 being produced at Savannah River. At
the time, smart activists and journalists put two and two together and
inferred that the purpose of the SRS plutonium-242 was for use in DARHT.
Basic physics provides a rationale. When weapons-grade plutonium-239 reaches
a critical mass, a nuclear chain reaction begins, a phenomenon that severely
limits the type of nuclear weapons testing that can be done in a test
ban environment. But plutonium-242 is much less fissionable. That means
an identical mass of plutonium to that used in a weapon could be imploded
with a full charge of high explosives with no nuclear yield resulting.
While that won’t help weapons scientists understand the physics of the
nuclear blast itself, it could allow them to analyze in great detail the
behavior of the plutonium as it liquifies and is squeezed inward by the
high explosive blast used to set off a nuclear weapon.
As plutonium ages and develops imperfections, the behavior of the material
in that crucial instant becomes one of the key questions facing the weaponeers
as they cope with an aging arsenal that they are not permitted to test
directly with underground blasts.
There was a feud within the Energy Department in 1996 over the classification
of the use of plutoniuin-242 in the DARHT tests, with classification and
weapons program officials favoring declassifying it, while nonproliferation
officials opposed any such move. Thus, the potential use of plutouium-242
at DARHT remains officially classified, but officials speaking with NW&M
Monitor confirmed the general outlines of a program in which plutonium-242
will be detonated in containment vessels at DARHT. Whether that plutonium-242
would actually be assembled into a warhead configuration remained unclear.
In his letter to the DNFSB, Reis offered assurances that the work would
be done safely. Any containment vessel blasts with larger explosive charges
than those already approved will not be done until full safety analyses
are completed, Reis said.
(Courtesy of Exchange/Monitor Publications, Inc.)