{"id":434,"date":"2016-08-13T20:43:36","date_gmt":"2016-08-14T02:43:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/?p=434"},"modified":"2016-08-13T20:44:01","modified_gmt":"2016-08-14T02:44:01","slug":"selected-news-analysis-re-present-and-future-great-power-wars-aug-1-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/2016\/08\/13\/selected-news-analysis-re-present-and-future-great-power-wars-aug-1-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Selected news &#038; analysis re present and future great power wars, Aug. 1-13"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is a first attempt at pulling together recent articles of interest to our members. This format is experimental and will no doubt change. I (Greg) have included what I think are some of the most interesting articles bearing on present and future great power wars, just from the past thirteen days. Articles on other themes will follow, perhaps in a simpler format.<\/p>\n<p>You will understand that memes of &#8220;Russian aggression,&#8221; &#8220;our adversaries in Asia,&#8221; etc. <em>ad nauseum<\/em> bear heavily on U.S. conversations about nuclear weapons. A massive mountain of propaganda is being dumped on us daily, which is difficult for many people to see through. We must try, and we must succeed <em>one way or another<\/em>, or our civilization will surely end. Hence the subject of this first summary.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/thesaker.is\/statement-by-the-foreign-ministry-of-russia-on-terror-attacks-in-crimea\/\">Statement by the Foreign Ministry Of Russia on terror attacks in Crimea<\/a><\/strong> (<a href=\"http:\/\/thesaker.is\/\">Vineyard of the Saker<\/a>) (some of the comments are also interesting and are revealing of how others elsewhere think, an antidote to U.S. propaganda and groupthink)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Russia\u2019s Federal Security Service (FSB) has disrupted a plot to carry out terrorist attacks in the Republic of Crimea. The attacks, planned by the Ukrainian Defence Ministry\u2019s Chief Intelligence Directorate, targeted critical infrastructure and facilities in Crimea. Russia\u2019s intelligence services take the view that these planned acts of sabotage and terrorism were intended to destabilise the socio-political situation in the region in the run-up to federal and regional elections&#8230;.<br \/>\nThe attempts to enter Crimea unlawfully, the recent attempt on the life of Head of the Lugansk People\u2019s Republic Igor Plotnitsky, the constant firing along the line of contact in Donbass, and the actions of radical nationalists and so-called \u2018activists\u2019 from around Ukraine that go beyond the bounds of any lawful framework are a vivid illustration of the state of affairs in Ukraine today. The numerous provocations, efforts to portray Moscow as the enemy, and the deliberate cultivation of anti-Russian sentiments are an attempt by the Ukrainian government to distract the public from the country\u2019s own troubles and the problems affecting the majority of people in Ukraine. We see a deliberate effort to divert public attention from the actions and responsibility of those in power and their inability to carry out long overdue reforms and conduct an honest investigation into the murders of journalists and human rights activists and the crimes committed in 2014 during the Maidan protests, in Odessa, Mariupol, and other cities&#8230;.<br \/>\nAttempts to destabilise the situation in Russian Crimea are doomed to fail. Russia unconditionally guarantees Crimea\u2019s stability and security.<br \/>\nKiev and its foreign backers should know that any harm to Russia or the deaths of Russian personnel will not go unanswered.<br \/>\nAs President Vladimir Putin noted on August 10, given the current situation and until we see real positive steps from Kiev, like renouncing terror and provocations, it makes little sense to hold Normandy format meetings, like the Beijing meeting in early September requested by Mr Poroshenko recently.<br \/>\nOnce again, we call on our partners to use their influence with Kiev to dissuade the government from taking any dangerous steps that could have grave consequences. Playing with fire is dangerous.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<div class=\"yt-lockup-content\"><strong><a class=\"yt-uix-sessionlink yt-uix-tile-link spf-link yt-ui-ellipsis yt-ui-ellipsis-2\" dir=\"ltr\" title=\"Who Instigates Russian-Ukrainian War Over Crimea?\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=In6H3ntgRjI\" data-sessionlink=\"ei=jtOvV-nnJYT8ugLEpoFQ&amp;feature=c4-videos-u&amp;ved=CDUQvxsiEwjp5uuu6r_OAhUEvk4KHURTAAoomxw\">&#8220;Who Instigates Russian-Ukrainian War Over Crimea? <\/a><\/strong>(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=In6H3ntgRjI\">Southfront<\/a> video), Aug. 11, 2016<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;<strong><a href=\"Media%20Builds%20Up%20Enemies%20For%20Hillary%27s%20Wars\">Media Builds Up Enemies For Hillary&#8217;s Wars<\/a>,&#8221;<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/\">Moon of Alabama<\/a>, Aug. 11, 2016<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A &#8220;Russian cyberattack&#8221;? How can the NYT claim such, in an opening paragraph, when even the Director of U.S. National Intelligence\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/r-us-intelligence-chief-not-ready-to-identify-who-is-behind-dnc-hack-2016-7?IR=T\">is unable<\/a>\u00a0to make such a judgement?&#8230;<br \/>\nThe &#8220;Russia is guilty&#8221; claim for whatever happened, without any proof, is becoming a daily diet fed to the &#8220;western&#8221; public. A similar theme is the &#8220;barrel bombing&#8221; of (the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/2016\/07\/last-hospital-in-aleppo-destroyed-week-after-week-after-week.html\">always same<\/a>) &#8220;hospitals&#8221; in Syria which is claimed whenever the Syrian government or its allies\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/www.syriahr.com\/en\/?p=48899\">hit some al-Qaeda headquarter<\/a>.<br \/>\nAll this propaganda is in preparation of the rule of the &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=6DXDU48RHLU\">We came, we saw, he died. Hahaha &#8230;<\/a>&#8221; psychopathic queen of war Hillary Clinton.<br \/>\nAs Marc Wheeler, aka emptywheel, reminds us: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/emptywheel\/status\/763362610607685632\">6:13 AM &#8211; 10 Aug 2016<\/a>\u00a0emptywheel @emptywheel: &#8220;The actions to ensure we will escalate our wars are being taken as we speak. January will be too late to stop it.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/2016\/08\/08\/russia-syria-and-the-us-hillarys-foreign-policy-priority\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">&#8220;Russia, Syria and the US: Hillary\u2019s Foreign Policy Priority&#8221;<\/a><\/strong>, Gary Leupp, Aug. 9, 2016 (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/\">Counterpunch<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Stepping back a bit: in August 2011, when Obama and Clinton both demanded Assad\u2019s departure, and closed down the U.S. embassy in Damascus, the opposition to Assad had been largely nonviolent. But armed factions were, with U.S. encouragement, already taking shape, loosely coordinating as something called the \u201cSyrian Free Army.\u201d They included many pro-al-Qaeda elements who officially formed the al-Nusra Front (Jabhat al-Nusra) in January 2012.<br \/>\n(The rule, if you haven\u2019t noticed, is: When the U.S. overthrows a secular leader in the Middle East, or tries to, it creates a power void; it creates promised lands of opportunity for vicious jihadis, whose atrocities justify the redeployment of U.S. troops to the country involved in order to \u201cpreserve regional stability\u201d and so forth. It is as though Washington is actively working to enrage, not only your everyday Muslim anywhere in the world, but your everyday anyone anywhere in the world, by its regime change bombing campaigns rationalized by lies.)<br \/>\nAl-Nusra gained widespread respect among the armed rebels in Syria in 2012. The U.S. press gave slight attention to the fact that the \u201cFree Syrian Army\u201d publicly justified and insisted upon its alliance with this al-Qaeda chapter.<br \/>\nCurrently most factions (80% in one estimate) of the hundreds of Syrian Free Army factions work with al-Nusra. They value its experience and competence, even if they may dislike its puritanism in such matters as tobacco smoking and personal appearance. U.S. officials have long since realized that to topple Assad they need to\u2014if not befriend al-Nusra directly (repeat: al-Nusra\/ Fatah al-Sham was until yesterday an official al-Qaeda affiliate)\u2014at least give their (more) directly subsidized associates leave to mingle as needed, to get the regime change job done.<br \/>\nBy 2014, with Assad still in charge and al-Nusra coming to dominate the \u201copposition,\u201d Obama asked Congress for money to fund a program for U.S. personnel to train in Jordan some 15,000 armed rebels in marksmanship, navigation and other skills. But as of September 2015, as a sheepish-faced General Lloyd Austin, commander of U.S. Central Command, told Congress, \u201cWe\u2019re talking four or five\u201d fighters actually trained.\u00a0 In that same month, it was announced that about 70 fighters of \u201cDivision 30\u201d\u2014Syrians trained in Turkey, under the \u201cSyrian Trade and Equip\u201d program, had upon entering Syria turned over their weapons to al-Nusra&#8230;<br \/>\nThe fact of the matter is, the U.S. has found it difficult, after all that\u2019s happened in the region in this young century, to recruit Syrians willing to work with them. Blinded by their Exceptionalism, U.S. policy-makers can\u2019t get it through their heads that U.S. actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen and Libya do not endear them to the peoples of those countries. Quite the opposite.<br \/>\n&#8230;<br \/>\nKerry like Obama seems conflicted about what to do in Syria. He wants to topple Assad, because the U.S. government has announced he must go, and once such a proclamation is issued, it cannot (like a law of the Medes and Persians) be retracted for fear of loss of face. But Kerry\u2019s also been (like Obama, who as you recall cluelessly called ISIL a \u201cJV team\u201d in August 2014) shocked by the sudden rise of that horrid outgrowth of the U.S. destruction of Iraq. It would be embarrassing if ISIL takes Damascus and blows up all the ancient Christian sites. Especially if Putin and tens of millions of Russian Orthodox believers who feel akin to Syrian \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Orthodox Christians are standing around saying, \u201cI told you this would happen, if you keep focusing so stupidly on Assad\u201d).<br \/>\nSo of course U.S. leaders have to condemn, and to some extent wage war on, ISIL as well as al-Nusra. The problem is how to pursue that objective while simultaneously maintaining that Assad is the main problem, and arguing that his very persistence in power strengthens the terrorists. It doesn\u2019t make any sense.<br \/>\nIn fact, the weakening of central state power encouraged by the U.S. since 2011 has allowed these groups to seize territory and advance their positions, while the reclamation of state authority when it\u2019s happened has set back the bad guys. Or at least the worst guys.<br \/>\nThe faction in the State Department that never learns anything and is currently demanding regime change is getting louder. The manifesto published by the 51 State Department dissidents suggests too much attention has been placed on countering ISIL. What we really need to do, they say, is step up efforts to remove Assad. \u00a0\u00a0 Despite The weird, unprecedented nature of the dissidents\u2019 memo leak, Kerry has pronounced himself sympathetic. Meanwhile the recent statement from the \u201cCenter for a New Security\u201d headed by key Clinton aide and likely future Secretary of Defense Michele Flournoy similarly promotes regime change.<br \/>\nOn July 29\u2014the day that she secured the Democratic nomination in that sickening display of <em>USA! USA! <\/em>jingoism\u2014Clinton\u2019s campaign stated that she will \u201creset\u201d U.S. Syrian policy as a top priority in office, to focus on toppling Assad from power. (Surprise, surprise, you fools who assumed she\u2019d learned something from Libya.)<br \/>\nFor all with ears to hear\u2014and have learned anything at all since 9\/11 and the inception of the era of constant wars, based on lies\u2014the war-drums are sounding. But as MSNBC\u2019s Chris Matthews notes, \u201cAmericans don\u2019t care anything about foreign policy.\u201d<br \/>\nOne can only hope that the crazies in Syria are rolled back by rational secular forces before January, aided perhaps by welcome, coordinated foreign air power, when the <a href=\"http:\/\/store.counterpunch.org\/product\/queen-of-chaos\/\">Queen of Chaos<\/a> comes to the throne (if so she does).<br \/>\nBecause if she gets her chance, she will be looking for excuses to bomb Damascus.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-commentary-china-apps-idUSKCN10I0WB\">Commentary: Here\u2019s how a U.S.-China war could play out<\/a>,&#8221;<\/strong> Peter Apps, Reuters, Aug. 8, 2016<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Last week, U.S.-based think tank RAND Corporation \u2013 which also studied the prospects of war in the NATO member Baltic states \u2013 unveiled its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rand.org\/pubs\/research_reports\/RR1140.html\">latest thinking<\/a> on what a potential clash between the United States and China would look like&#8230;<br \/>\nRAND examined two different scenarios, one for an inadvertent conflict taking place in the present day and one in 10 years from now, assuming Beijing\u2019s military and economic buildup continues at roughly its current rate. China will substantially close its military gap with the United States over the next decade, it predicts \u2013 but the fundamental dynamics of how things will play out might not be hugely different.<br \/>\nEven now, the People\u2019s Liberation Army is seen as having the ability to give a bloodied nose to U.S. forces in the region. Washington could expect to lose an aircraft carrier and multiple other surface warships in the opening stages, RAND warns, citing Chinese advances in ballistic and guided missiles as well as submarines.<br \/>\nThe report does not estimate the number of human casualties, but they could be substantial. The loss of an aircraft carrier or several major surface warships could easily cost thousands of lives in an instant.<br \/>\nAt the same time, it\u2019s also generally assumed that both Beijing and Washington would have considerable success with cyber attacks.<br \/>\nThe real decision for Washington would be how much military force to commit to the Asia Pacific theater&#8230;.<br \/>\nWhether a conflict only endured days or weeks or dragged on for a year or more, Washington would almost certainly retain the ability to strike widely at Chinese targets across the battle space \u2013 including, in at least a limited way, into mainland China&#8230;.<br \/>\nThe real battle of attrition, however, would be economic \u2013 as it almost always is when great powers confront each other&#8230;.<br \/>\nPerhaps most importantly, China might find itself cut off from vital external energy sources while Washington\u2019s energy supply chain would be far less affected&#8230;<br \/>\nWhile RAND estimates a year-long Asian war would take 5-10 percent off U.S. gross domestic product, it believes China\u2019s economy could shrink by up to 25 percent&#8230;<br \/>\nIn the case of the United States and China, RAND\u2019s analysts say they believe nuclear escalation would likely be avoided even if both sides fought prolonged naval and air battles.<br \/>\n<span id=\"articleText\"><span id=\"midArticle_1\"><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/atimes.com\/2016\/08\/china-central-asian-states-watch-as-us-legitimizes-al-qaeda-in-syria\/\">China, Central Asian states watch as US legitimizes Al Qaeda in Syria<\/a>,&#8221;<\/strong> <span class=\"byline\"><span class=\"author vcard\"><span class=\"url fn n\">Christina Lin<\/span><\/span><\/span>, <time class=\"entry-date\" datetime=\"2016-08-07T09:42:24+00:00\">August 7, 2016<\/time> (<span class=\"byline\"><a href=\"http:\/\/atimes.com\/category\/asia-times\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Asia Times<\/a><\/span>)<span class=\"byline\">&lt;the_category(&lt; p=&#8221;&#8221;&gt; <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 If anything, the proposals would serve Saudi Arabia\u2019s agenda to import its austere Wahhabism in the Arab Gulf to the Levant and Eastern Mediterranean, and empower radical Islamist groups in the Mideast to harm US national security as well as Eurasian stability.<br \/>\nUS\/Saudi air campaign in Yemen has already devastated the country and empowered Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and Washington is again illegally bombing Libya to fight the jihadists it supported from its bombing five years ago.<br \/>\nIt is also mind-boggling why Washington boasts US is a global leader in counter-terrorism while simultaneously stating it has no problem supporting jihadi groups that violate human rights and commit war crimes: chop off children\u2019s heads;<a href=\"http:\/\/atimes.com\/2016\/08\/china-central-asian-states-watch-as-us-legitimizes-al-qaeda-in-syria\/#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a> use chemical weapons on civilians;<a href=\"http:\/\/atimes.com\/2016\/08\/china-central-asian-states-watch-as-us-legitimizes-al-qaeda-in-syria\/#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\">[7]<\/a> oppress women; massacre Christians, Alawites, and other religious and ethnic minorities.<br \/>\nNonetheless, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said \u2018one incident here or there\u201d of beheading or chemical attacks will not stop Washington\u2019s funding of jihadi groups.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><strong>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2016\/08\/05\/behold-a-pale-horse-and-its-riders-name-was-death-paul-craig-roberts\/\">Behold, a Pale Horse and its Rider\u2019s Name Was Death<\/a>,&#8221;<\/strong> Paul Craig Roberts, Aug. 5, 2016 (<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/\">Paul Craig Roberts\/Institute of Political Economy<\/a><\/span>)<br \/>\n<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 I just listened to Obama give Washington\u2019s account of the situation with ISIL in Iraq and Syria.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 In Obama\u2019s account, Washington is defeating ISIL in Iraq, but Russia and Assad are defeating the Syrian people in Syria. Obama denounced Russia and the Syrian government\u2014but not ISIL\u2014as barbaric. The message was clear: Washington still intends to overthrow Assad and turn Syria into another Libya and another Iraq, formerly stable and prosperous countries where war now rages continually.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 It sickens me to hear the President of the United States lie and construct a false reality, so I turned off the broadcast.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 If Helen Thomas were still there, she would ask the Liar-in-Chief what went wrong with Washington\u2019s policy in Iraq. We were promised that a low-cost \u201ccakewalk\u201d war of three or six weeks duration would bring \u201cfreedom and democracy\u201d to Iraq. Why is it that 13 years later Iraq is a hellhole of war and destruction?<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 What happened to the \u201cfreedom and democracy?\u201d And the \u201cCakewalk\u201d?<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 You can bet your life that no presstitute asked Obama this question.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No one asked the Liar-in-Chief why the Russians and Syrians could clear ISIL out of most of Syria in a couple of months, but Washington has been struggling for several years to clear ISIL out of Iraq. Is it possible that Washington did not want to clear ISIL out of Iraq because Washington intended to use ISIL to clear Assad out of Syria?<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Washington produced this violence. Where is the question: \u201cWhy, Mr. President, did Washington introduce 15 years of massive and ongoing violence into the Middle East and then expect us to believe that it was the fault of someone else?\u201d<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &#8230;<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing have understood the message. Washington intends war. The purpose of Washington\u2019s lies is to prepare the insouciant Western peoples for war against the two countries that Washington cannot subjugate except by victory in war&#8230;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><strong>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/news\/2016-08-03\/prepare-war-sea-china-defense-minister-warns\">Prepare For &#8220;War At Sea&#8221; China Defense Minister Warns<\/a>,<\/strong>&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/\">Zero Hedge<\/a>, Aug 3, 2016<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 In the latest escalation of bellicose rhetoric over the territorial dispute involving the South China Sea, Chinese Defense Minister Chang Wanquan warned of &#8220;offshore security threats&#8221; and urged for a &#8220;substantial preparation for a people&#8217;s war at sea&#8221; to safeguard sovereignty, China&#8217;s Xinhua writes.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The warning comes a day after China launched a massive naval drill which is set to prepare China for a &#8220;sudden, cruel and short&#8221; war.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Chang was speaking during an inspection of national defence work in coastal regions of east China&#8217;s Zhejiang Province. He called for recognition of the seriousness of the national security situation, especially the threat from the sea.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Chang said the military, police and people should prepare for mobilization to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity. He also asked to promote national defense education among the public.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0 \u00a0 [The newspaper] said that &#8220;China doesn&#8217;t want wars, a war with the US in particular. The only possible scenario for a Sino-US war is that the US corners China on its doorstep with unacceptable provocations and China has to fight back.&#8221;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 We will be very prudent about going to war, but if a war is triggered, we will have greater determination than the US to fight it to the end and we can endure more losses than the US.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">The contiguous US can only avoid being stricken under the condition that China&#8217;s land is not attacked&#8230;.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">The biggest risks that countries such as Japan and the Philippines will be embroiled into war come from their alliances with the US, which will tie them to the chariot of the US.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">Mello (more on this in a pending article from us):<br \/>\n<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 RAND seems to think that China does not now have and cannot soon make more high-tech missiles and other theater defenses, cannot hide them, and that we can &#8220;take out&#8221; their bases and capabilities, leaving our [presumed huge, and presumed available] military forces available to win.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"> I think the truth might be, or might be soon, otherwise.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><br \/>\nLRSO [the Long Range Stand Off air-launched stealthy nuclear cruise missile] is needed to &#8220;signal&#8221; that the &#8220;rules of the game&#8221; are that the US must always win and therefore must always dominate, end of story. LRSO makes them back down before taking out carriers, other capital ships, and US bases. That is the idea. It is why <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/AGM-158_JASSM\">JASSM-ER<\/a> is not enough, why LRSO is not completely redundant. We need a BIGGER stick than JASSM-ER, not just something to throw back that is similar to what they might throw at us, and it has to be stealthy. 300 tons (unboosted yield, easily done) or 4-5 kt, on up to 150 kt, or whatever is deemed a big enough stick.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\"><br \/>\nWhen STRATCOM uses the word &#8220;deterrence,&#8221; they now mean deterring the prospect of losing any war, anywhere, anytime. They mean the old Roman ultima ratio, the final decider, the winning weapon. Which is why Obama will not sign a no-first-use (NFU) declaration, or if he does it will be meaningless. The objective situation is that the US is inexorably losing control of its empire. The American Century is over. LRSO is a desperate measure. It is a very dangerous situation. <\/span><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;\">Comment on this from a colleague:<br \/>\n<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>RAND is not in touch with their home planet. <\/em><br \/>\n<em> The US flew, what, 50,000 missions in Iraq and couldn&#8217;t take out all of Saddam&#8217;s Scuds.\u00a0 Even a preemptive nuclear strike wouldn&#8217;t take out everything.<\/em><br \/>\n<em> Chinese hypersonic missiles will quickly sink the US ships in the South China Sea.\u00a0 They would probably hit US bases in Japan and Okinawa, which would remove any advantage current forward basing allows&#8230;.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>&#8220;Kerry&#8217;s And Al-Qaeda&#8217;s &#8220;Very Different Track&#8221; Attack On Aleppo Fails,&#8221;<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/\">Moon of Alabama<\/a>, Aug. 4, 2016 (see also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/2016\/08\/the-larger-context-of-the-jihadi-attack-on-aleppo-.html\">The Larger Context Of The Jihadi Attack On Aleppo<\/a>, Aug. 1, 2016<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The current attack on the government held Aleppo by al-Qaeda in Syria (aka Jabhat al Nusra aka Fateh al Scam) was launched on August 1st. With up to 10,000 insurgents participating the attack was unprecedented in size.<strong> August 1st is exactly the same date Kerry had set as starting date for &#8220;a very different track&#8221;. <\/strong>This is likely not a random coincidence.<br \/>\nDespite the very large size of the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidesourcenews.com\/#%21Aleppos-Decisive-Battle\/cjds\/57a131750cf253edccf1536e\">Great Battle of Aleppo<\/a>&#8221; and its possibly decisive character for the war neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post has so far reported on it.<br \/>\nThe U.S. had long prepared for an escalation and extension of the war on Syria. In December and January ships under U.S. control <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/2016\/04\/us-delivers-3000-tons-of-weapons-and-ammo-to-al-qaeda-co-in-syria.html\">transported<\/a> at least 3,000 tons of old weapons and ammunition from Bulgaria to Turkey and Jordan. These came atop of hundreds of tons of weapons <a href=\"http:\/\/www.balkaninsight.com\/en\/article\/montenegro-opens-weapons-supply-line-to-saudi-arabia-08-02-2016\">from Montenegro<\/a> transported via air to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. According to the renown <em>Janes Defense<\/em> military intelligence journal these <a href=\"http:\/\/www.janes.com\/article\/58544\/bulgarian-ammo-features-heavily-in-syrian-weapons-seizures\">Bulgarian weapons ended up in Syria<\/a> where the Syrian army confiscated some of them from al-Qaeda and U.S. supported insurgents.<br \/>\nDuring the ceasefire and negotiations with Russia, the U.S. and its allies continued to arm and support their proxies in Syria even as those were intimately coordinating and integrating with al-Qaeda. The U.S. does not consider these groups to be terrorists, no matter with whom they associate or whatever they do. Even when such a group <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/2016\/07\/cia-rebels-behead-kid-and-other-recent-us-successes-in-syria.html\">beheads<\/a> a 12 year old, sick child in front of running cameras the U.S. State Department continues to support them and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsroomamerica.com\/story\/589387.html\">opines<\/a> that &#8220;<strong>one incident here and there would not necessarily make you a terrorist group<\/strong>.&#8221;<br \/>\nGood to know &#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>Comment on this from a colleague:<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Endless unreported support for Al Qaeda by the US.<\/em><br \/>\n<em> The unreported story of massive US arms shipments to Al Qaeda in Syria in preparation for their unreported massive attack on Aleppo and its disastrous results. Weren&#8217;t they the reason we invaded Afghanistan and passed the Patriot Act? You know, the Act that ended the US Constitition?<\/em><br \/>\n<em> How many millions of people has the US injured, killed, and made homeless in the last 16 years? Does anyone here even care? It is just business as usual as far as I can tell.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is a first attempt at pulling together recent articles of interest to our members. This format is experimental and will no doubt change. I (Greg) have included what I think are some of the most interesting articles bearing on present and future great power wars, just from the past thirteen days. Articles on other&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/2016\/08\/13\/selected-news-analysis-re-present-and-future-great-power-wars-aug-1-13\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Selected news &#038; analysis re present and future great power wars, Aug. 1-13<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","neve_meta_reading_time":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-highlights"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ZtEt-70","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=434"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":435,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434\/revisions\/435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasg.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}