January 1, 2024 Discussion in Santa Fe tomorrow, Tuesday 1/2/24, 6 pm, St. John's United Methodist Church; other meetings this month; "Call for Sanity" and City of Santa Fe resolution status (Previous letter, 12/19/23: City of Santa Fe resolution status; volunteer meeting in Santa Fe tomorrow evening 12/20/23 (call if interested); new ad in SF Reporter; thank you for your support and reach out to others if you can)
Good morning, and happy New Year, friends -- First, we are going to meet tomorrow, January 2, at 6 pm in the Gathering Room at St. John's United Methodist Church (SJUMC) in Santa Fe (map), to discuss issues related to the runaway expansion of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). If you have questions about our last two centerfold ads in the Santa Fe Reporter (here and here), bring those questions. Second, mark your calendars. We have a number of other events planned for this month, including but not limited to these:
Third, our "registry of resistance," the "Call for Sanity, Not Nuclear Production" is growing. If you don't want New Mexico to host a new plutonium factory, or alternatively if you don't want a new arms race, for which LANL pit production is absolutely essential, please help it grow! How can you help? It's very simple. Just ask any business, nonprofit organization, or religious organization you know, or frequent, to endorse this Call! As of this writing we have 138 businesses and "orgs" and 656 individuals on-board. We'd like to have at least a dozen more businesses, churches and orgs, and at least 44 more individual endorsers, by the time the City Quality of Life Committee meets this Wednesday evening. It's super-simple. Here's what it says:
This is really, really important because there are a lot of people who want LANL to be a pit factory, including most (all?) arms control groups and some "antinuclear" nonprofits. This political support, amplified by a colonial and "company-town" reticence to speak up against "The Power on The Hill," obscures the factual realities that would normally bring a swift end to this cockamamie plan. That is half the reason this dumb plan maintains momentum even as it struggles managerially, with 6 years delay already baked in. (The other half of its irrational support is the war frenzy in DC.) Our silence is taken as assent and indeed encouragement for a new nuclear arms race. LANL pit production will fail if there is significant opposition in New Mexico, or in DC. They need support in both places. Meanwhile northern New Mexico will never thrive, with LANL so greedy, toxic, and obese. Fourth, the City of Santa Fe resolution against pit production has hit snags. We will be meeting with the Mayor and others tomorrow about it and can report further in the evening. Given the sensitivity of negotiations, that's all I can say now, except this: we will publicly oppose any LANL resolution that does not categorically oppose plutonium pit production at LANL. Weaselly, incoherent formulations we have seen before, like "no pit production until it is certified to be safe," are pathetic, as pit production will never be safe. They are basically green lights for pit production. Silence would be better. Best wishes to all, Greg |
|||
|
|||
|